EXTREME Overclocking Forums
Home | Reviews | Forums | Downloads | RealTime Pricing Engine | Folding Stats Contact Us


Go Back   EXTREME Overclocking Forums > Intel Specific > Intel Memory

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-23-2012, 12:01 AM   #1
Astaldoath
Sith Lord
Senior Member
 
Astaldoath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 752
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Overclocking a 2500k with 16 gb of ram vs 8

Would there be big difference in clock speeds I could get if i got say 2 2x4 gb sets of the same ram?

Im considering 16gb for things like the skyrim toolset and other toolsets that take 2-4 gb up themselves.

also if the mobo supports 2133 would that be better or standard 1600 for ocing
__________________
Rig-

Processor: Intel c2d e8600
Heatsink: Xig 1280 rifle
Mobo: Asus P5Q pro
Ram: Corsair 2x2gb 1066
Video: GTX 260 216
Storage: WD 500 GB x 2, WD External 750GB
Optical: CD Burner, DVD Rom
Case Fans: Thermaltake 75 cfm x 3
Power: OCZ StealthXStream 500

Last edited by Astaldoath; 03-23-2012 at 12:16 AM.
Offline  
Old 03-23-2012, 04:49 AM   #2
mimart7
Je plie, donc je suis
Senior Member
 
mimart7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,787
iTrader: 1 / 100%
I'm not 100% sure, but I think it's easier to oc with 2 ram sticks. Just buy an 8 gig set (2x4). The egg has plenty that are inexpensive. Make sure you get a set rated at 1.5 v. Unless you're benching, 1600 is fine.
__________________
Corsair A 540, 5930K, Asrock X 99 Extreme 4, G Skill Ripjaws 4 Series 16 GB (4X4) 3000 15-16-16-35, ASUS Strix GTX 970 Samsung 850 Pr0 512 GB SSD WD Black Series 2003 FZEX 2TB, Asus Xonar STX
EVGA 850 Watt PSU, Cooler Master Nepton 280L, Win 10 Pro
Offline  
Old 03-23-2012, 05:01 AM   #3
Nagoshi
Canuck Chicken Chaser
Senior Member
 
Nagoshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Drummondville QC
Age: 26
Posts: 10,370
iTrader: 20 / 100%
On 155, because you're basically stuck OCing using the multi, it doesnt stress the IMC enough at higher overclocks to make your RAM unstable when using 4 sticks. IMO it wont hurt a OC so long as you dont start pushing the RAM hardcore.
__________________

New school!: 2500K @ 4.9 1.425v // Z68XP-UD3P
2x2GB G.Skill ECO 1600 7-8-7-24 // XFX HD6950 2GB
XFX 650W Core // Apogee XT + 19" x 30 passes condenser heatsink/4 fans + MCP655-B // CM Stacker 830/red Sickleflows
Force 3 60GB/300GB Velo/320GB AAKS/1TB 7200.12

Old school high-tea-pea-sea: E8500 @ 4322MHz (455x9.5) // P5Q Pro
2x2GB HyperX 1066 5-5-5-15 @ 1092 // HIS 6670 1GB
Antec HCGamer 620W // TT DuOrb + CM 360 // 1TB 7200.12

White netbook with an Apple sticker on it: Gateway LT2106h // Atom N450 1.67GHz // 1GB RAM 667 5-5-5-15
GMA 3150 // 10.1 LED 1024x600 // 80GB 7200.4 // W7 Ult
Offline  
Old 03-23-2012, 11:42 AM   #4
Astaldoath
Sith Lord
Senior Member
 
Astaldoath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 752
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nagoshi View Post
On 155, because you're basically stuck OCing using the multi, it doesnt stress the IMC enough at higher overclocks to make your RAM unstable when using 4 sticks. IMO it wont hurt a OC so long as you dont start pushing the RAM hardcore.
ok thats what i wanted to know
__________________
Rig-

Processor: Intel c2d e8600
Heatsink: Xig 1280 rifle
Mobo: Asus P5Q pro
Ram: Corsair 2x2gb 1066
Video: GTX 260 216
Storage: WD 500 GB x 2, WD External 750GB
Optical: CD Burner, DVD Rom
Case Fans: Thermaltake 75 cfm x 3
Power: OCZ StealthXStream 500
Offline  
Old 04-02-2012, 10:10 PM   #5
Slizzo
Mad Warranty Voider
Senior Member
 
Slizzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Age: 34
Posts: 3,437
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Take a look at my rig. Haven't even pushed it at all.
__________________
Corsair Carbide 500R White
ASUS P8Z68-V PRO
Intel Core i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz @ 1.275v (so far)
Corsair H60 - Stock fan, stock block. Fan is mobo controlled.
G.Skill F3-12800CL9Q-16GBRL 4x4GB @ Stock

Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold Series 800W
Galaxy GeForce GTX 780 & ASUS GTX780 Direct CU II OC in SLI
Acer XB270HU (Primary) & QNIX QX2710 (Secondary)
Klipsch Promedia 5.1 ULTRA on ASUS Xonar DX
OCZ Vector 512GB, 2x Samsung 830 128GB, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 750GB, WD Caviar GP 1.5TB, OCZ Vertex 2 60GB
G15/R.A.T. 7

Offline  
Old 04-02-2012, 10:14 PM   #6
Urbanfox
I Regret Nothing
Senior Member
 
Urbanfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Whittier, CA
Age: 29
Posts: 6,391
iTrader: 17 / 95%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astaldoath View Post
Would there be big difference in clock speeds I could get if i got say 2 2x4 gb sets of the same ram?

Im considering 16gb for things like the skyrim toolset and other toolsets that take 2-4 gb up themselves.

also if the mobo supports 2133 would that be better or standard 1600 for ocing
16GB shouldn't affect your CPU OC'ing, but it will affect your memory OC'ing. Since Sandy Bridge isn't bandwidth starved, I wouldn't worry about pushing memory that much anyway for everyday use.
__________________
3570K @ 4.5GHz 1.15v ~ 16GB G.Skill 1600 8-8-8 ~ Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H
GTX 970 SLI
Crucial MX100 512GB ~ 840 EVO 250GB ~ PNY XLR8 240GB ~ Seagate 1 TB
OCZ ZX 850 ~ NZXT Kraken X60 ~ XCLIO Touch 787

G2130 ~ 4GB ~ EVGA Z77 FTW
7850 Crossfire
OCZ Vertex 3 60GB ~ Seagate 1 TB ~ Rosewill Capstone 750 ~ Corsair Carbide 540




Offline  
Sponsored Links:
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 AM.

Copyright 2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2000 - 2016, EXTREME Overclocking