[Official] Post Your 3D Mark 11 Scores Here.

[Stewart@MSD]

Stewart@MSD - 14346 - i7-2600K @ 4.4GHz - 2 x 7970 @ 1125/1520

[TR-909]

that's a really nice score there. the Tahiti seems capable of some really nice clocks.

[buttons]

Originally Posted by Stewart@MSD

Stewart@MSD - 14346 - i7-2600K @ 4.4GHz - 2 x 7970 @ 1125/1520

I wish your CPU-Z was not in the way of the 3dmark2011 scores. id like to see each individual test. do you have the URL for that submission?

[Stewart@MSD]

Originally Posted by buttons

I wish your CPU-Z was not in the way of the 3dmark2011 scores. id like to see each individual test. do you have the URL for that submission?

Sorry mate, can you elaborate a little?

**edit**
Sorry, see what you mean. No I dont seem to have, but I have one noted down here for 14211 that was running the core 25mhz slower.
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2755956

[moosteve]

Originally Posted by Stewart@MSD

Sorry mate, can you elaborate a little?

on the webpage for your resulys, there is a breakdown in how your system performed... but your cpuz is covering those results in your picture.

the web address is individual for every test run, you your results have their own individual address. if you didn't save it, if you look in the history of your browser, you should find something simply called "Results"... if you clock on it, it will bring up your test and you can copy and paste the address here so we can see your full test results.

ninja'd!

[Stewart@MSD]

Originally Posted by moosteve

on the webpage for your resulys, there is a breakdown in how your system performed... but your cpuz is covering those results in your picture.

the web address is individual for every test run, you your results have their own individual address. if you didn't save it, if you look in the history of your browser, you should find something simply called "Results"... if you clock on it, it will bring up your test and you can copy and paste the address here so we can see your full test results.

ninja'd!

Sorry mate, edited my quote above before your posted, and also just ran a fresh test. Result = 14642.

Additional Comment:

I have figured out what you mean so run the test again with my gaming profile and took a screenshot with better placed info boxes. Is this a better format guys?



Link to score.

[buttons]

wow 80fps on test one, i think i scored 42.22 ...

[Witchdoctor]

http://hwbot.org/submission/2250187_...70_17782_marks

[TR-909]

@Witchdoctor; you rock

[TR-909]

P8418 3DMarks
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2783406

[titin200]

P8795 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2938808

My CPU seems to be holding my score back alot but ahwell.

[AnomalouS]

AnomalouS - P8269 - 2600k @ 4.9Ghz - 1 x GTX 580 @ 1000/1980/2145 - AIR

[rambo1e]

rambo1e http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3248813
P10674 3820@4375 2x570 sli

[titin200]

P11742

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/3678580

[moosteve]

Originally Posted by Spac3BendeR

Spac3BendeR - SCORE - Phenom II x4 965 @ 3.79Ghz - 2x5770 @ 875/800 Unified/1250 - Air

Is this low for 2x5770? Consider, too, the same apps/settings enabled while gaming were left on including dual monitors. It only makes sense to see that value 1st because all benches run while less resources are in use easily report a higher number. Guess you can say I'm looking for "actuality" out of it instead of "probability". This is my first time using an "official" bench with'm to test their performances and benching w/multi-gpu. Kinda expected more out of the CFx-hmm I might have to see if the score goes up using 1x5770 @ 950/1380.... Did slight research skimming over some previous 1x5770 solutions and those 3dMark11 scores were averaging in the 30-48xx range. CFx isn't closer to 7-9k average? Also I'd seen one 5870x2 score in the 10k range under a 4Ghz quad core AMD CPU. I can tell you every game thrown at them runs smoothly at 1680x1050 or lower-1080p on the Bravia even smoother.
----Had an afterthought:

Doesn't the display's connection type also affect image processing? e.g. performance? min[vga---svga----DVI---HDMI---Display Port----Thunderbolt]MAX
Apologies if the last two are out of order>.>

you are right in the ballpark. here is an olllddd bench i ran with my 1090T.

score

[leekirlew]

Ran a test on my sig system as stock, gonna try some o'cing and putting 3s mark on my ssd and see if i can up the score



Additional Comment:

P8925 - I7 3770K @ 4.4GHZ, MSI 670 OC @ 1130MHZ/3215MHZ MEM

[Ajax37]

It was faster when I had the second card in a pci-e x8 slot instead of both in x16 because for some odd reason I had to take down my CPU overclock to make it stable again. Now its just at 4.2ghz, but I think it's not too shabby for what it is.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4101061

[benniebeeker]

I'll play!!! (even though this bench is over a year old)
Haven't tried clocking this beast in a while.

980x 4.5ghz
ddr3 2100mhz 9-9-9-24
gtx 580 sli 925/2300

12703

Additional Comment:

Originally Posted by Witchdoctor

http://hwbot.org/submission/2250187_...70_17782_marks

dang brah!!!! going big time!!!

[Pako]

P16383
X6390

Witchdoctor is dominating and making me hate my cards that won't overclock.

[Witchdoctor]

That's an incredible score for water bro......... ,

my runs the CPU was on a single stage and the cards were on LN2...