My first MW3 montage

[c0reyl]

Everyone might call me a noob for playing a "console port" or w/e, but since cod4 was my favorite fps game of all time, and I lost the CD key for it.. I ended up getting mw3.

I have a terrible internet connection right now, and this was kind of just a montage I threw together more as a test to see if it would turn out okay editing wise than anything else.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr_HIIneQhw&hd=1

So you know, sniper is probably my worst gun lol

Have fun flaming

[Almost Tactf]

I'm not here to flame but a ton of those shots were total misses, the one at 0:59 is way off. Has CoD gotten this lax in precision when it comes to the hit-boxes?

[overclockerx]

how the hell did I read that title as; black ops 2 first game play trailer

anyways, nice but quick scoping is getting rather old

[FX5200]

MW3 Hitreg is truly ****. COD4 Promod/PAM is the only way to go, competitive-wise. Also, why only pub frags?

c0reyl, me at my finest ^^

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-nx_Ebk4M8

[c0reyl]

One thing to note.. EVERY quickscope I did was a hardscope, even when it looked like the noscope on the stairs. I scoped in EVERY KILL. SOME OF THOSE MISSES LOOK LIKE MISSES because the killcam and theater mode are actually lagging a lot more combined with my crappy internets.

We pay for 10mbits, but sometimes it goes as low as .3mbits. Sometimes I have more than 4 seconds of lag while gaming, and it can go from 4 sec of lag to 35 ms to 2 seconds random all over the place in the same game. We have a brand new modem and brand new router. The ISP keeps telling us "they are working on it". Last time I called them, they pinged the router at over 400 ms, OUR ISP PINGING IT... No other possible ISP available in my area, so they are a greedy monopoly.

Originally Posted by Almost Tactf

I'm not here to flame but a ton of those shots were total misses, the one at 0:59 is way off. Has CoD gotten this lax in precision when it comes to the hit-boxes?

They weren't missing.. my internet is so bad that I instantly have to re learn where the hitboxes are every game. laggy internet is one thing, but constantly changing lag is the WORST because you have no idea where the hitbox will be.

Originally Posted by FX5200

MW3 Hitreg is truly ****. COD4 Promod/PAM is the only way to go, competitive-wise. Also, why only pub frags?

c0reyl, me at my finest ^^

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-nx_Ebk4M8

Nice game

MW3 doesn't even have ranked dedicated servers.Infinity ward completely hates PC gaming

[overclockerx]

Originally Posted by c0reyl

One thing to note.. EVERY quickscope I did was a hardscope, even when it looked like the noscope on the stairs. I scoped in EVERY KILL. SOME OF THOSE MISSES LOOK LIKE MISSES because the killcam and theater mode are actually lagging a lot more combined with my crappy internets.

We pay for 10mbits, but sometimes it goes as low as .3mbits. Sometimes I have more than 4 seconds of lag while gaming, and it can go from 4 sec of lag to 35 ms to 2 seconds random all over the place in the same game. We have a brand new modem and brand new router. The ISP keeps telling us "they are working on it". Last time I called them, they pinged the router at over 400 ms, OUR ISP PINGING IT... No other possible ISP available in my area, so they are a greedy monopoly.




They weren't missing.. my internet is so bad that I instantly have to re learn where the hitboxes are every game. laggy internet is one thing, but constantly changing lag is the WORST because you have no idea where the hitbox will be.




Nice game

MW3 doesn't even have ranked dedicated servers.Infinity ward completely hates CUSTOMERS

fixed it for ya

[c0reyl]

Originally Posted by overclockerx

fixed it for ya

I'm pretty sure IW promotes hacking on PC now.. They do NOTHING to stop it...COD4 and punkbuster worked well..The graphics of MW2 is BETTER than MW3..

And they are using an outdated game engine that uses directx code from TEN YEARS AGO...games from 2006 have BETTER GRAPHICS than games coming out in 2012 because IW made it okay to be lazy as **** and make terrible graphics xbox games then make a half assed PC port of them that everybody buys anyway.

Someone tell me why it's so hard to ask for Crysis graphics as a standard today, when that game was made in 2007? at this rate, my old rig with an e6600@ 3.65ghz and my old 8800gtx is going to be overkill for 95% of pc games for the next 5 years...too bad I even bothered replacing it

[Almost Tactf]

It's because CoD delivers 60FPS on a console, they can't afford to make a new engine and keep that kind of performance.

[SpAzErMaN]

One recommendation: take out the 25 second intro.

[hostage67]

Originally Posted by Almost Tactf

I'm not here to flame but a ton of those shots were total misses, the one at 0:59 is way off. Has CoD gotten this lax in precision when it comes to the hit-boxes?

One of the many reasons I hate MW3 is that they use an "Auto-Aim" feature. All you have to do is be in the ballpark, that's why quick-scoping has become a huge thing in MW3 because it abuses this mechanic.

Also to the OP, a nearly 30 second intro is never a good thing, especially when you are doing nothing for the entire 30 seconds. 5-10 seconds for an intro like you had is more than enough.

[c0reyl]

Originally Posted by hostage67

One of the many reasons I hate MW3 is that they use an "Auto-Aim" feature. All you have to do is be in the ballpark, that's why quick-scoping has become a huge thing in MW3 because it abuses this mechanic.

Also to the OP, a nearly 30 second intro is never a good thing, especially when you are doing nothing for the entire 30 seconds. 5-10 seconds for an intro like you had is more than enough.

you do realize that EVERY quickscope I had in that video was actually a hardscope, as in I looked through the scope fully EVERY KILL, even when it looked like a noscope on the stairs. Every one of my quickscopes is a hardsope. Theater mode and killcam are too slow to show the scope fully on some of my kills for the split second the scope was up. I don't believe in that halfway zoom bullcrap.

[Scubar]

Its COD, it takes absolutely no ability whatsoever to kill people on it.

COD is only there for the people who aren't good enough to be competative on proper FPS games.

[c0reyl]

Originally Posted by Scubar

Its COD, it takes absolutely no ability whatsoever to kill people on it.

COD is only there for the people who aren't good enough to be competative on proper FPS games.

My garbage internet doesn't even allow me to be competitive on any fps game, including COD. I Was at LEAST 5 times better when I played cod4 when I had a good 30mbit fibre optic connection with no lag. now, I can't play for ****. I'm terrible compared to what I used to be.

Oh, and if you say CS is a proper FPS game, I'll just laugh at you, because CS is ******ed. it has horrible graphics, the engine is out dated, the spray pattern is ******ed, you can't even aim down the sights of the gun ( ******ED ), you can't sprint ( ******ED ), snipers are insta zoom ( ******ED ). Halo 2 has better mechanics than that garbage game.

[FX5200]

Originally Posted by c0reyl

Oh, and if you say CS is a proper FPS game, I'll just laugh at you, because CS is ******ed. it has horrible graphics, the engine is out dated, the spray pattern is ******ed, you can't even aim down the sights of the gun ( ******ED ), you can't sprint ( ******ED ), snipers are insta zoom ( ******ED ). Halo 2 has better mechanics than that garbage game.

...





No hope for this one...

[hostage67]

I play the following two FPS games atm...

Battlefield 3 - This is considered the top FPS atm by most players. It's not perfect and certainly still has it's issues, but the ground game is pretty good and the graphics are hard to beat.

Blacklight - This is actually a free FPS I started playing with my Nephew. It's not bad but employs the pay to win mentality. I refuse to buy anything on it for real money, but short of that it's actually not too bad. Clearly not as good as BF3, but might be more similar to MW3 or COD.

[c0reyl]

Originally Posted by FX5200

...





No hope for this one...

Explain to me exactly how CS is so good? It literally has worse graphics than my phone..

Originally Posted by hostage67

I play the following two FPS games atm...

Battlefield 3 - This is considered the top FPS atm by most players. It's not perfect and certainly still has it's issues, but the ground game is pretty good and the graphics are hard to beat.

Blacklight - This is actually a free FPS I started playing with my Nephew. It's not bad but employs the pay to win mentality. I refuse to buy anything on it for real money, but short of that it's actually not too bad. Clearly not as good as BF3, but might be more similar to MW3 or COD.

After BF bad company, I hated BF completely. BF2 was awesome. Blacklight just sucks, and they are attempting to gain money from people willing to pay to win, which they WILL, and a LOT will. I guess it's better than hacks everywhere though

Additional Comment:

can someone tell me why the hell the hitboxes in this game are FAR more accurate with all the eyecandy disabled, and only 2xAA and AF? I have far less lag in multiplayer but I have to make it look like xbox graphics..this is ******ed.

What's the point of even having a computer that can max out crysis when I have to make all my settings look like crap to be competative?

[hostage67]

Originally Posted by c0reyl

After BF bad company, I hated BF completely. BF2 was awesome. Blacklight just sucks, and they are attempting to gain money from people willing to pay to win, which they WILL, and a LOT will. I guess it's better than hacks everywhere though

BF3 is closer to BF2 than BadCompany was. I agree BadCompany ****ed me off, and frankly I think BF3 will be my last EA game. They just don't seem to care about quality anymore. While BF3 does really well in some areas, it also falls flat on it's face in others.

Blacklight isn't perfect, but it's free. The pay to win mantra isn't my thing, but it does seem to be fairly well balanced and the purchased items aren't usually game breaking. Even as a noob starting out against a bunch of fairly well geared players I still often placed in the top 3. It isn't on par with BF3, but it's free so you can't really complain too much. It generally seems to work well I haven't seen any blatant bugs and I have only seen one cheater so far. Most of the powerful options can be gained by purchasable equipment so there is little need for cheats. There are very few items that also require you to pay real money, I think the only one is the Hero classes which give slightly better stats than you can otherwise get. But short of that everything else looks like it can at the very least be purchased on a rental basis.

[FX5200]

Originally Posted by c0reyl

Explain to me exactly how CS is so good? It literally has worse graphics than my phone..

From a competitive standpoint, its excellent. That's all I'm looking at. Graphics are unimportant, if you want to play a game for graphics, snag Crysis 3 when it comes out.

[c0reyl]

Originally Posted by hostage67

BF3 is closer to BF2 than BadCompany was. I agree BadCompany ****ed me off, and frankly I think BF3 will be my last EA game. They just don't seem to care about quality anymore. While BF3 does really well in some areas, it also falls flat on it's face in others.

Blacklight isn't perfect, but it's free. The pay to win mantra isn't my thing, but it does seem to be fairly well balanced and the purchased items aren't usually game breaking. Even as a noob starting out against a bunch of fairly well geared players I still often placed in the top 3. It isn't on par with BF3, but it's free so you can't really complain too much. It generally seems to work well I haven't seen any blatant bugs and I have only seen one cheater so far. Most of the powerful options can be gained by purchasable equipment so there is little need for cheats. There are very few items that also require you to pay real money, I think the only one is the Hero classes which give slightly better stats than you can otherwise get. But short of that everything else looks like it can at the very least be purchased on a rental basis.

I played the blacklight beta, and didn't really like it much :/

Originally Posted by FX5200

From a competitive standpoint, its excellent. That's all I'm looking at. Graphics are unimportant, if you want to play a game for graphics, snag Crysis 3 when it comes out.

What about the other issues I addressed?

[vai0]

Originally Posted by c0reyl

What about the other issues I addressed?

The engine is outdated? The movement in 1.6 is perfect for tactical competitive gameplay.

Aiming down the sites is great for realism not competitive gameplay.

You can walk though, which adds loads more depth then sprinting.

Its not instant zoom its about 1/16th of a second and there is nothing wrong with it for competitive play. You dont see more then 1 or 2 awps in a 5v5 on some maps you see none. And they cost more, you know the entire team economics involved in CS.

Here is my latest clip if you care about a ****ty decade old game that is still most played on steam and in tournaments worldwide - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mgros...1&feature=plcp