| Home | Reviews | Forums | Downloads | $ EXTREME Deals $ | RealTime Pricing | Free Magazines | Gear | Folding Stats | Newsletter | Contact Us |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome Guest Visitor! Please Register, It's Free and Fun To Participate! | |
|
The EXTREME Overclocking Forums are a place for people to learn how to overclock and tweak their PC's components like the CPU, memory (RAM), or video card in order to gain the maximum performance out of their system. There are lots of discussions about new processors, graphics cards, cooling products, power supplies, cases, and so much more!
You are currently viewing our boards as a "guest" which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You need to register before you can post: click the register link to proceed. Before you register, please read the forum rules. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free! To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. After you have registered and read the forum rules, you can check out the FAQ for more information on using the forum. We hope you enjoy your stay here! Note To Spammers: We do not allow unsolicited advertising! Spam is usually reported & deleted within minutes of it being posted, so don't waste your time (or ours)! |
|
| Please Register to Post a Reply |
|
|
Thread Tools |
09-23-2003, 07:07 PM
|
#1 | ||||
|
Paleontologist
Senior Member
|
Athlon 64 Review up at Anandtech (intel owned again)
an Athlon 64 clocked at 1.8 Ghz beat a P4 clocked at 3.0 Ghz thats a CPU running 1.2 Ghz slower and doing better these suckers are really efficient and are going to make great gaming machines i wonder how they fold? http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1884 i hope this article hasnt been posted before |
||||
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 07:10 PM
|
#2 | ||||
|
Paleontologist
Senior Member
|
i dont get it Anandtech showed it doing real good against the p4 then toms hardware does an article and the last link says this
Summary: The P4 3.2 EE wins 32 times, the Athlon 64 FX-51 15 times - an uncertain 64-bit future for AMD WTF tom how much do you get paid from intel? EDIT oh never mind tom brought in an intel 3.2 3.4 and 3.6 to compete against a 1.8 and claimed intel the victor wow it took a 3.2 to beat a 1.8 man intel owns... 
|
||||
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 07:42 PM
|
#3 | ||||
|
we all know tom sucks...
anyways, P4's will still win overall in folding, and have the uppper hand in editing, some workstation apps, etc.. Hammer gained an edge over intel in effective memory bandwidth by reducing latencies, and SSE2 making zipping, and unzipping A LOT faster. P4s used t owin there, now Hammer takes the lead. Hammer = games and 64-bit stuff, some server stuff, and increased workstation capabilities P4 = performance on workstation apps, folding, a few games, and media manipulation. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 08:28 PM
|
#4 | ||||
|
Learning To Overclock
Regular Member
|
yeah tom has gone downhill.. lack of articles and bs recently
|
||||
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 08:50 PM
|
#5 | ||||
|
1GHz+OC 1.47-2.48!
Senior Member
|
Tom's sucks. They are in peoples pockets and are almost always bias.
|
||||
|
|
|
09-23-2003, 09:31 PM
|
#6 | ||||
|
Mad Warranty Voider
Senior Member
|
I find a lot of conflicting things on this. SOme are Intel stacked, some are AMD stacked
|
||||
|
|
Sponsored Links:
|
| Please Register to Post a Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
