![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
||||
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome Guest Visitor! Please Register, It's Free and Fun To Participate! | |
|
The EXTREME Overclocking Forums are a place for people to learn how to overclock and tweak their PC's components like the CPU, memory (RAM), or video card in order to gain the maximum performance out of their system. There are lots of discussions about new processors, graphics cards, cooling products, power supplies, cases, and so much more!
You are currently viewing our boards as a "guest" which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You need to register before you can post: click the register link to proceed. Before you register, please read the forum rules. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free! To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. After you have registered and read the forum rules, you can check out the FAQ for more information on using the forum. We hope you enjoy your stay here! Note To Spammers: We do not allow unsolicited advertising! Spam is usually reported & deleted within minutes of it being posted, so don't waste your time (or ours)! |
|
| Please Register to Post a Reply |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | ||||
|
I wipe with authority
Senior Member
|
Latency Settings and their Impact on Memory Performance
"Memory modules are currently available which support a wide variety of different speeds and latency settings. Speed is easy to understand - in general, faster is better. But what do the latency settings mean? And, what impact do they have on memory performance? This paper will provide a brief background on latency settings and what they mean. Then, we will move to the lab, where we will run a suite of benchmarks over a wide variety of latency settings, and we will measure the impact of these settings on benchmark scores. " The pdf is posted on Corsair's Tech Notes page and can be seen here; Corsair Memory |
||||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
|
I hate bronies!
Senior Member
|
Wow, that really explains alot. Great find!
Now we can tweak with a purpose! |
||||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
|
Hunting Ding Dongs...
Senior Moderator
|
Cool! I like the global comparison. Good work from Corsair.
Interesting though, because I remember cuddles thread on XS showing the latencies independently were having no impact on Doom3. Maybe each one individually was not enough to alter the results? Take a look: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=48634 This is an excellent chart, although in my own tests on an XP system, tRCD did not have 1/4 of that impact - about the same as tRP... at least on 3DMark01. Their overall 3DMark01 score looks reasonable. Someone double-check these results. Last edited by WiCKeD : 03-30-2005 at 08:49 AM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
EA Ports
Senior Member
|
They're playing at higher resolutions Wicked. Those benches were done at 640x480, where it's ALL cpu limitation. At 1280x1024, or 1600x1200(and usually with AA) it won't be noticed due to the fact that you're coasting on gpu power and not cpu.
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||
|
Hunting Ding Dongs...
Senior Moderator
|
Quote:
Anyway, none of that explains the difference in tRCD. V Thanks, but I just pulled it from the PDF in the first post It is very handy, though.
Last edited by WiCKeD : 04-07-2005 at 09:30 AM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||
|
3> Linux 3>
Senior Member
|
Wicked that table is a pretty nice table...
Good find! Rich |
||||
|
|
|
|
| Please Register to Post a Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|