EXTREME Overclocking Forums
Home | Reviews | Forums | Downloads | $ EXTREME Deals $ | RealTime Pricing | Free Magazines | Gear | Folding Stats Newsletter | Contact Us


Go Back   EXTREME Overclocking Forums > Website Related Info (No Post Increase) > Official EOC Folding @ Home Team
Register Forum Rules FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome Guest Visitor! Please Register, It's Free and Fun To Participate!
The EXTREME Overclocking Forums are a place for people to learn how to overclock and tweak their PC's components like the CPU, memory (RAM), or video card in order to gain the maximum performance out of their system. There are lots of discussions about new processors, graphics cards, cooling products, power supplies, cases, and so much more!

You are currently viewing our boards as a "guest" which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You need to register before you can post: click the register link to proceed. Before you register, please read the forum rules. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free! To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

After you have registered and read the forum rules, you can check out the FAQ for more information on using the forum. We hope you enjoy your stay here!

Note To Spammers: We do not allow unsolicited advertising! Spam is usually reported & deleted within minutes of it being posted, so don't waste your time (or ours)!


Please Register to Post a Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-29-2005, 05:20 PM   #1
sdat1333
________
sdat1333's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5,681
Last Seen: 09-30-2012
Age: 23
From: Raleigh, NC
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Anyone installed FAH on an X2?

I was just wondering if anybody could tell me how fast WUs complete on the X2 proc? thanks
Sean
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-29-2005, 05:22 PM   #2
XT-ChAce
Smooth bastard
XT-ChAce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 6,228
Last Seen: 01-03-2013
Age: 25
From: Amsterdam
iTrader: 0 / 0%
The same speed, that's why you run two instances so it completes two at the same time However, its not entirely twice as fast, little efficiency loss but it would be faster...
England  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-29-2005, 05:43 PM   #3
instinctgone
Banned!
Banned
Don't ask why unless you want to join them.
You will see identical performance when running 1 instance at the same Ghz as a single core a64. Like Chace said,...when you run 2 instances your first will take a small performance hit,..but overall you will complete more WU's in a shorter time.
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-29-2005, 05:52 PM   #4
Macaholic
Fold different.
Macaholic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 237
Last Seen: 06-14-2012
From: 1 Infinite Loop
iTrader: 0 / 0%
I'll let you know once I get it all put together. Hoping to push the 4800+ close to 3.0GHz on quality air.

United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-29-2005, 07:27 PM   #5
instinctgone
Banned!
Banned
Don't ask why unless you want to join them.
3.0 should be possible with a real good cooler and some top of the line paste. What are the current ambient temps you are getting inside of your case with your current system? Middle of summer can be a tough time on overclocking. 3.0 with 2 instances should crank out some really quick WU's as long as you keep an eye on what you are working on.
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-29-2005, 09:45 PM   #6
DriveEuro
Mad Warranty Voider
DriveEuro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 6,926
Last Seen: Yesterday
Age: 30
From: IL
iTrader: 53 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macaholic
I'll let you know once I get it all put together. Hoping to push the 4800+ close to 3.0GHz on quality air.

Why would you buy the 4800 when the 4400 is cheaper and OCs just as well?

Why not save a few hundred dollars?
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-29-2005, 09:52 PM   #7
sdat1333
________
sdat1333's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5,681
Last Seen: 09-30-2012
Age: 23
From: Raleigh, NC
iTrader: 13 / 100%
why buy a 6800 ultra instead of a GT?
same argument
becaues he can
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-29-2005, 10:29 PM   #8
DriveEuro
Mad Warranty Voider
DriveEuro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 6,926
Last Seen: Yesterday
Age: 30
From: IL
iTrader: 53 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdat1333
why buy a 6800 ultra instead of a GT?
same argument
becaues he can
Not quite. A 6800GT doesn't have as many pixel pipelines as a 6800U. Now if you said an X800XT and an X800XTPE then it would be the "same argument".

United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-29-2005, 10:35 PM   #9
Topher
___________________
Topher's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,126
Last Seen: 01-04-2012
Age: 25
From: Carlisle, PA
iTrader: 2 / 100%
no, a 6800gt and 6800U both have 16 pipelines

the 6800 has 12

a 6800U will usually oc more than a gt, that's why
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-30-2005, 12:26 AM   #10
instinctgone
Banned!
Banned
Don't ask why unless you want to join them.
lol, why is this post getting so far off topic?
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-30-2005, 03:13 PM   #11
sdat1333
________
sdat1333's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5,681
Last Seen: 09-30-2012
Age: 23
From: Raleigh, NC
iTrader: 13 / 100%
ok last off topic thing
yes the only advantage is taht the ultra has a possibility of overclocking better, but its the same argument as it is with the 3700 sandiego/4000 sandiego, and 4400vs.4800
see, same thing.
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-30-2005, 03:16 PM   #12
Transnone13
Mad Motorcycle Racer
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5,549
Last Seen: Today
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Im getting the 4800 over the 4400 becuase I dont want to HAVE to OC to have the best and when I do I have a higher multi and probably a better chip.
United States  Online
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-30-2005, 03:52 PM   #13
Shadowmage
Laptop Guru
Shadowmage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,450
Last Seen: 04-02-2009
Age: 25
From: Ann Arbor, MI
iTrader: 9 / 100%
I think that running 4 FAH clients at the same time would be more effective than just running 2.

That's because the X2 chips have "virtual hyperthreading". I wonder what that really does.
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-30-2005, 03:54 PM   #14
davidhammock200
Old Fart OverClocker
davidhammock200's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 20,464
Last Seen: 07-21-2011
Age: 59
From: Las Vegas, NV.
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowmage
I think that running 4 FAH clients at the same time would be more effective than just running 2.

That's because the X2 chips have "virtual hyperthreading". I wonder what that really does.
First I've heard of this!

Do you have any links?

Thanks,
Dave
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-30-2005, 04:13 PM   #15
sdat1333
________
sdat1333's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5,681
Last Seen: 09-30-2012
Age: 23
From: Raleigh, NC
iTrader: 13 / 100%
yah ive never heard of virtual hyperthreading on any AMD product.
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-30-2005, 04:42 PM   #16
Shadowmage
Laptop Guru
Shadowmage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,450
Last Seen: 04-02-2009
Age: 25
From: Ann Arbor, MI
iTrader: 9 / 100%
lol, never seen CBI screenshots of the X2 chip?

It's mostly to take advantage of software that utilizes HT but not dual cores, but i wonder what it'll do with FAH.

Can't find the screenshots atm, but it's there. I saw it on Xtremesystems
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 06-30-2005, 11:16 PM   #17
DriveEuro
Mad Warranty Voider
DriveEuro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 6,926
Last Seen: Yesterday
Age: 30
From: IL
iTrader: 53 / 100%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transnone13
Im getting the 4800 over the 4400 becuase I dont want to HAVE to OC to have the best and when I do I have a higher multi and probably a better chip.
Then enjoy running a 200mhz HTT rather than like 275mhz
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-01-2005, 10:40 AM   #18
retslag1
Need help?
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1,399
Last Seen: 06-01-2013
Age: 29
iTrader: 13 / 100%
I have read that intel's HT proc are like having roughly 1.2-1.3 proc...so any idea what the X2's are like...able to get more folding done than a HT intel proc??
United States  retslag1 Folds For EOC!  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-01-2005, 11:06 AM   #19
sdat1333
________
sdat1333's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5,681
Last Seen: 09-30-2012
Age: 23
From: Raleigh, NC
iTrader: 13 / 100%
yah will intels hyperthreading is kinda wierd and stuff so it doesnt give much of a bonus
basically hyperthreading takes advantage of extra idle cycles and uses them, so im not sure how much it helps in something really proc intensive like folding.
Since there are two physical proccessors on the X2, it should get more of a figure like 1.8 processors due to overhead, etc, etc
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Old 07-01-2005, 11:15 PM   #20
Macaholic
Fold different.
Macaholic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 237
Last Seen: 06-14-2012
From: 1 Infinite Loop
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Toledo A64 X2 4800+
220x12
2640.3MHz
1.360v
2.5-3-3-8
Good place to start

p741
Time Per Frame 00:14:10
Time Per Unit 23:36:40

p746
Time Per Frame 00:18:30
Time Per Unit 30:50:00
United States  Offline
    Register to Reply to This Post
Sponsored Links:
Please Register to Post a Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2011, EXTREME Overclocking