![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
||||
|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome Guest Visitor! Please Register, It's Free and Fun To Participate! | |
|
The EXTREME Overclocking Forums are a place for people to learn how to overclock and tweak their PC's components like the CPU, memory (RAM), or video card in order to gain the maximum performance out of their system. There are lots of discussions about new processors, graphics cards, cooling products, power supplies, cases, and so much more!
You are currently viewing our boards as a "guest" which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You need to register before you can post: click the register link to proceed. Before you register, please read the forum rules. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own pictures, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free! To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. After you have registered and read the forum rules, you can check out the FAQ for more information on using the forum. We hope you enjoy your stay here! Note To Spammers: We do not allow unsolicited advertising! Spam is usually reported & deleted within minutes of it being posted, so don't waste your time (or ours)! |
|
| Please Register to Post a Reply |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | ||||
|
________
Senior Member
|
Anyone installed FAH on an X2?
Sean |
||||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||
|
Smooth bastard
Senior Member
|
The same speed, that's why you run two instances so it completes two at the same time
However, its not entirely twice as fast, little efficiency loss but it would be faster...
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
|
Banned
Don't ask why unless you want to join them. |
You will see identical performance when running 1 instance at the same Ghz as a single core a64. Like Chace said,...when you run 2 instances your first will take a small performance hit,..but overall you will complete more WU's in a shorter time.
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
Fold different.
Senior Member
|
I'll let you know once I get it all put together. Hoping to push the 4800+ close to 3.0GHz on quality air.
![]() |
||||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||
|
Banned
Don't ask why unless you want to join them. |
3.0 should be possible with a real good cooler and some top of the line paste. What are the current ambient temps you are getting inside of your case with your current system? Middle of summer can be a tough time on overclocking. 3.0 with 2 instances should crank out some really quick WU's as long as you keep an eye on what you are working on.
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||
|
Mad Warranty Voider
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Why not save a few hundred dollars? |
||||
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||||
|
________
Senior Member
|
why buy a 6800 ultra instead of a GT?
same argument becaues he can |
||||
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||||
|
Mad Warranty Voider
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||||
|
___________________
Senior Member
|
no, a 6800gt and 6800U both have 16 pipelines
the 6800 has 12 a 6800U will usually oc more than a gt, that's why |
||||
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||||
|
Banned
Don't ask why unless you want to join them. |
lol, why is this post getting so far off topic?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||||
|
________
Senior Member
|
ok last off topic thing
yes the only advantage is taht the ultra has a possibility of overclocking better, but its the same argument as it is with the 3700 sandiego/4000 sandiego, and 4400vs.4800 see, same thing. |
||||
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||||
|
Mad Motorcycle Racer
Senior Member
|
Im getting the 4800 over the 4400 becuase I dont want to HAVE to OC to have the best and when I do I have a higher multi and probably a better chip.
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||||
|
Laptop Guru
Senior Member
|
I think that running 4 FAH clients at the same time would be more effective than just running 2.
That's because the X2 chips have "virtual hyperthreading". I wonder what that really does. |
||||
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||||
|
Old Fart OverClocker
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Do you have any links? Thanks, Dave |
||||
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||||
|
________
Senior Member
|
yah ive never heard of virtual hyperthreading on any AMD product.
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||||
|
Laptop Guru
Senior Member
|
lol, never seen CBI screenshots of the X2 chip?
It's mostly to take advantage of software that utilizes HT but not dual cores, but i wonder what it'll do with FAH. Can't find the screenshots atm, but it's there. I saw it on Xtremesystems |
||||
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||||
|
Mad Warranty Voider
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||||
|
Need help?
Senior Member
|
I have read that intel's HT proc are like having roughly 1.2-1.3 proc...so any idea what the X2's are like...able to get more folding done than a HT intel proc??
|
||||
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||||
|
________
Senior Member
|
yah will intels hyperthreading is kinda wierd and stuff so it doesnt give much of a bonus
basically hyperthreading takes advantage of extra idle cycles and uses them, so im not sure how much it helps in something really proc intensive like folding. Since there are two physical proccessors on the X2, it should get more of a figure like 1.8 processors due to overhead, etc, etc |
||||
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||||
|
Fold different.
Senior Member
|
Toledo A64 X2 4800+
220x12 2640.3MHz 1.360v 2.5-3-3-8 Good place to start p741 Time Per Frame 00:14:10 Time Per Unit 23:36:40 p746 Time Per Frame 00:18:30 Time Per Unit 30:50:00 |
||||
|
|
|
|
| Please Register to Post a Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|