Looks like new 160s are available

[Bannor]

I just updated EMIII because I had a couple unknown single gromacs. Turns out they are 160s.

[eneuman]

not again

[EvuLFleA]

Feel sorry for those 500mhz boys.

[CrazyP]

yeah I got two, so it will be a few days on those rigs.

[Cyrus_Elmarel]

Originally Posted by EvuLFleA

Feel sorry for those 500mhz boys.

My poor,poor little 533Mhz hes a scrapper,but i still hope he doesnt get a 160.

[S3CUR3 1]

Ha! I have a Celery 566 that just took 10 days to finish a 160! lol

[EvuLFleA]

I take about 24 hours to finish a 160 I got 2 of them.

[arunabh]

i too got it.....will take approx 25 hours[7 remaining]
i have a question.....im getting "Timered Checkpoint Triggered"...
is it ok...??
im attaching a pic

[Hack99]

Yes, thats normal. Looks like you have your interval set at 3 minutes. You can run the config again and set it higher if you want. 15 minutes is default I think.

[skylarkman]

is there a way to clear the 160's off a machine thats too slow like say i get one on my PII 450Mhz system is there someway i can scrap it and get another project
?? Thanks

[Hack99]

Shut down FAH
Delete the work folder and the queue.dat file
Restart FAH

It will download a new WU but you may have to try a few times to get a different one.

[TOMVILL]

Yes i just got them again the 160 pointers Project 212_villanURE212 can any one tell me but it seems longer than before i installed a new cpu but isn,t 12.5 minutes a frame a little long for a 4.0 ghz Intel P4.The rig is stable and no memory errors in memtest 86. What do ya think ?should it be running a little faster than this.

[RealBeast]

Originally Posted by TOMVILL

Yes i just got them again the 160 pointers Project 212_villanURE212 can any one tell me but it seems longer than before i installed a new cpu but isn,t 12.5 minutes a frame a little long for a 4.0 ghz Intel P4.The rig is stable and no memory errors in memtest 86. What do ya think ?should it be running a little faster than this.

That sounds about right since by P4@3.16 takes about 16 minutes per step for p212.

I love the 212s -- 160 pts and they take 2/3 the time of the 70 pt Tinkers.

[TOMVILL]

Well it,s actually sped up a bit i,m not running a few more applications it,s down to 12 minutes. Thanks for the feedback. I just couldn,t remember what it took before, because of swapping mobos and cpu and doing a complete reinstall.That kept me pretty busy for 2 days.

[Smokin_Joe]

Man i just can't get another one, i got a p259_4Na right now that's worth 70 and is taking 10minutes a frame.

[Playful_Buffalo]

hey tom...is it safe to fold a rig with that high of an overclock

[TOMVILL]

Yes it,s safe for me i,m prommie cooled and no problems so far with it only running 1.575 volts on the cpu and with turbo, hyperthreading and pat enabled. Runs great with very good temps the evaporator temperature is -38 celcius. No memory errors or prime 95 errors.I,m getting very close to my power supply limits though so a new one will be in the works.

[aubsxc]

160 on a fast machine translates to high points per day output. Hope I get one on my amd rig and two on my HT rig tonite.

[TOMVILL]

Well it,s going to take me a little while to get back up their, only 1 machine but after i rma this 3.0 i,ll build another 3.6 ghz folder. I had tinkers for the first few days until i relized i didn,t put the flags in properly. I was getting between 800 and 900 a week until the 3.0 started acting up, but it was kind of a flakey chip from the day i got it.Hopefully i,ll get back to my weekly total and hold off a few of the guys. 160 pointers are nice less than 24 hours to do 1 wu.

[RealBeast]

Tomvill, don't look in the rear view mirror. hehe